Tuesday, April 8, 2014

House of Congressmen

[Spoiler Alert: I don’t tell you anything that actually happened in the first season of the US version of House of Cards but I do give you a general sense of how things went.]

I watched the first season of House of Cards but almost certainly won’t watch the second season. I love revenge movies, TV shows, books, and I enjoyed House of Cards through most of the season. By the last few episodes, however, it had violated my rules for revenge dramas:

Rule 1: The action taken in revenge must be proportionate to the original harm. So if someone steals your car, you don’t burn down their house. Unless, of course, having your car stolen means you couldn’t get your dying child to the hospital on time and the child’s death leads to your spouse’s suicide and your spouse’s suicide leads to your other child becoming a drug addict. In that case, load up on kerosene and matches and go to it.

Rule 2: There must not be a lot of collateral damage; furthermore, any collateral damage that does occur must be as mild as possible and must be unavoidable, that is, there cannot be another way to accomplish the revenge. In other words, you can burn down the someone’s house in the above example but you can’t do it while his or her family is inside. Or while the children’s beloved pet is inside.

House of Cards breaks both these rules plus the “these are just icky people” factor hadn’t gotten pretty bad by the end. (Which I suppose is a Rule 3: The person seeking revenge must be likable enough so I don’t think he deserved whatever horrible thing happened to him originally.) What drove me crazy while I was watching it, though, was the use of “Congressman” as a title for the main character.

Francis Underwood is a member of the United States House of Representatives. In the show, however, he is not addressed as “Representative Underwood” but as “Congressman Underwood”. I know this is a general trend: members of the Senate are usually referred to as “Senator” and members of the House of Representatives are increasingly often referred to as “Congressman”. I read something a year or two ago - perhaps longer - that decried this as evidence that Senators didn’t want to think of themselves as on the same level as their House colleagues and that Representatives didn’t want to think of themselves as mere “representers” but as powerful, independent agents. True or not, I don’t know.

What I do know is that John McCain is a “Congressman” just like Paul Ryan is a “Congressman”. So are Jeff Sessions, Mike Rogers, Adam Schiff, and, well, hmm... Nancy Pelosi is not a Congressman; neither is Kelly Ayotte. They are Congresswomen. And this is what I find particularly annoying about the use of “Congressman” instead of “Representative”.

We’ve spent the last forty or fifty years arguing over whether and how to rid the English language of words that assume the norm is male (or male is the norm, depending on how you look at it). We’ve created such hideousness as “chairperson”; we’ve tried to convince ourselves that using “they”, “them”, and “their” when referring to one single person is not a marker for ignorance and lack of education; we flirted with (although never embraced) “s/he”. And now we are tossing a nice, gender neutral word like “Representative” overboard in order to use a gender-laden (and less accurate) word like “Congressman”.

I don’t like pretentious but what I really hate is dumb.

*****

Reading:

Gender-Neutral Language Tips - A how-to guide with a light and grammatical touch. I particularly enjoyed this comment in the author’s section on the use of “s/he”:

(In recent years, I have noticed this tendency being mocked by people who use “s/h/it”instead of “she/he/it”.)

11 comments:

Ken said...

Ultimate revenge book: Count of Monte Cristo

Elise said...

So I've heard although oddly, I've never read it.

BTW, I checked out your blog account of your move - fun to read.

Anonymous said...

I agree with your House of Cards assessment. I'm almost finished with Season 2 and the characters have become so despicable I just don't care anymore. No nuances here. Last episode had back to back lesbian sex scene and 3 way with VP and wife and 3rd person (don't want to give anything away). Not sexy just creepy. Besides that the plot lines are so convoluted we have to keep pausing to get the story lines straight. Will finish this season but am done after that.

E Hines said...

Well, it's about time, Ollie. [g]

It's too bad the Tips author didn't publish copies of the letters he wrote to Justices Elena Kagan, Sonya Sotomayor, and Ruth Bader Ginsberg wherein he took them to task for their gender exclusion of using, almost universally, the female pronoun in their professional writing and speaking.

Wrt OP, [I]f someone steals your car, you don’t burn down their house. Yes, I do. I'm interested in far more than simple vengeance, or even punishment. I want, also, to discourage others from trying the same theft. I want, also, to preempt the thief's or his associates' coming after me or mine in vengeance for my having gotten them back. The house burns. WIth the thief inside, if possible. "Stealing my car" is an attack on my family, and that's...unacceptable.

Eric Hines

DL Sly said...

"So if someone steals your car, you don’t burn down their house. Unless, of course, having your car stolen means you couldn’t get your dying child to the hospital on time and the child’s death leads to your spouse’s suicide and your spouse’s suicide leads to your other child becoming a drug addict. In that case, load up on kerosene and matches and go to it."

*SNORT*
I'm sooo shamelessly stealing that and putting it up at VC -- with a link, of course.
0>:~}

DL Sly said...

OH, and do read the Count.
You.
Will.
LOVE.
It.
0>;~}

Elise said...

Not sexy just creepy

Yeah, that episode near the end of the first season with the wife in the hospital room - that's when I first decided things were getting icky. I get revenge and anger and hatred but I don't get gratuitous cruelty. And I particularly don't get creepy gratuitous cruelty.

Elise said...

Eric - revenge stories aren't about deterrence or punishment or any of that; they're just about revenge, a goal which stands on its own. If a drama is about deterrence or punishment, then it's a different animal entirely. And if a drama is about revenge then in order to pull me in, it needs to follow the rules.

Elise said...

DL - Steal away. Being quoted at VC is the highest form of flattery in Blogdom as far as I'm concerned.

And I guess I'll go dig the Count out of the basement library. Enough of the sweet cozy murder mysteries I've been reading - time for some serious damage. :+)

DL Sly said...

You can read it, and/or watch the latest remake version with Jim Caveziel and Guy Pierce as it was a very good rendition of the book.
And, I mean seriously, Jim Caveziel is so easy on the eyes.
0>;~}

Elise said...

Yes, Caveziel is. And I see this version also has Henry Cavill so between the two we are talking some serious eye candy here. So molto grazie for the suggestion. :+)